| |
|
 |
|
|
The
Asian Face of the Global Recession |
| |
| Feb
10th 2009, C.P. Chandrasekhar and Jayati Ghosh |
|
Delegates
to the World Economic Forum at Davos this year came
despondent and left in despair. Both the discussions
and the new evidence released at and during the Forum
indicated that the global crisis was not just bad, but
worse than originally anticipated. One damaging projection
came from the IMF in its January 2009 Update to the
World Economic Outlook, which declared: ''Global growth
in 2009 is expected to fall to half percent when measured
in terms of purchasing power parity and to turn negative
when measured in terms of market exchange rates. This
represents a downward revision of about 1¾ percentage
point from the November 2008 WEO Update.'' (Chart 1)
Chart
1 >>
Moreover, data released in recent months by the US Bureau
of Labour Statistics points to a sharp fall in non-farm
employment in the US in recent months (Chart 2). The
monthly decline in nonfarm payroll employment touched
598,000 in January when the unemployment rate rose from
7.2 to 7.6 percent. Nonfarm employment has declined
by 3.6 million since the start of the recession in December
2007, and about a half of this decline occurred in the
past 3 months (Chart 3). The impact this would have
on demand would only aggravate the recession.
Finally, there is evidence that the global recession
led by contraction in the US is transmitting itself
through global trade. Export growth from the advanced
economies is projected to fall from a positive 5.9 per
cent in 2007 and 3.1 per cent in 2008 to a negative
3.7 per cent in 2009. But this trend is not restricted
to the developed countries. The relevant figures for
the emerging and developing economies are 9.6 per cent,
5.6 per cent and -0.8 per cent. (Chart 4). It is small
recompense that growth is projected to rebound sharply
in 2010. Such projections are suspect, since the IMF
has made it a habit of putting out optimistic projections
and then revising them downwards.
Chart
2 >>
In fact, fear of a long recession stems not just from
the distressing developed country figures. It is also
triggered by evidence that the recessionary trend is
affecting Asia as well. Developing economies in Asia,
which as a group grew at 10.6 per cent and 7.8 per cent
in 2007 and 2008, are now expected to grow at just 5.5
per cent or 1.6 percentage points lower than projected
as recently as November last year. Japan was already
contracting by 0.3 per cent in 2008, and is projected
to see that figure falling to -2.6 per cent in 2009.
But the three growth engines in Asia, the ASEAN-5, China
and India also now seem to be badly affected by the
crisis. The ASEAN-5 economies, which grew at 6.3 and
5.4 per cent in 2007 and 2008, are now projected to
grow at 2.7 per cent in 2009 (down 1.5 percentage points
from the November 2008 estimates). The corresponding
figures for China are 13.0, 9.0 and 6.7 per cent (1.8
percentage points) and for India are 9.3, 7.3 and 5.1
per cent (1.2 percentage points). Moreover, the IMF
has predicted a damaging immediate future for South
Korea, with its economy projected to contract by 4 per
cent this year.
Estimates from national sources and elsewhere are less
pessimistic than the IMF, but there is consensus that
outside the US it is Asia where the recession is biting
most. This is reflected in available estimates on rising
employment. According to official Chinese figures, more
than 20 million rural migrant workers have lost their
jobs and returned to their homes as a result of the
global economic crisis. According to these estimates,
by January 25, 15.3 per cent of China's 130 million
migrant workers had lost their jobs and left coastal
manufacturing centres to return home. And the aggregate
figure of migrant job loss does not include those who
stayed back in cities in search of new jobs.
India too has made a feeble effort at estimating the
impact of the downturn on employment. An official survey
by the Labour Bureau focuses on 8 sectors (Mining, Textile
& Textile Garments, Metals & Metal Products,
Automobile, Gems & Jewellery, Construction, Transport
and the IT/BPO industry) to arrive at an estimate of
job loss as a result of the economic slowdown in the
country. In these sectors it sampled units employing
10 or more workers to make its estimates.
Chart
3 >>
The survey covered 2581 out of the sampled 3000 units
of which 1168 were from the Textile & Textile Garments
industry, followed by 752 in Metals & Metal Products,
242 in IT/BPO, 132 in Automobiles, 104 in Gems &
Jewellery, 103 in Transportation, 19 in Mining, and
61 in Construction. Based on this limited sample, the
total estimated employment in all the sectors covered
by the survey went down from 16.2 million during September
2008 to 15.7 million during December 2008, implying
a job loss of about half a million (Table 1). The actual
decline in employment if coverage and method were better
is likely to be much higher.
However, the survey does suggest that employment fell
in every month during this period. After September,
2008 employment in all industries declined at an average
rate of 1.01 per cent per month. A comparison of employment
in export and non-export units indicates that employment
declined at an average monthly rate of 1.13 per cent
in the case of the former, as opposed to 0.81 per cent
in the latter (Table 2), pointing to the direct role
of the global slowdown.
Table
1 >>
These trends in Asia are of significance because at
the time when the crisis was just beginning to unfold,
optimists pointed to Asia as the shock absorber that
would buffer the global downturn. A decoupled Asia,
it was argued, would through its own growth and the
demands that it would make on the world's output ensure
that the financial crisis that was largely a phenomenon
restricted to the developed countries would not have
as damaging an effect on global growth as the pessimists,
then in a minority, were predicting.
Chart
4 >>
Implicit in this confidence was the view that Asia was
a region where the turn to market friendly policies
was undertaken in a form and at a pace that had strengthened
these economies and delivered an ''Asian century''. When
sceptics pointed to the East Asian financial crisis,
they were countered with the view that 1997 was an aberration
that resulted from ''cronyism'' or some such intangible
and not from liberalisation and global integration.
Table
2 >>
It needs noting that the damage wrought by early liberalization
had forced many Latin American countries to search for
alternative strategies. The resulting turn in economic
policy-making in Latin America has had positive consequences.
In the past a crisis in the US and other developed countries
proved damaging for Latin American countries dragging
them down to degrees far greater than the crisis in
the developed countries itself. However, this time around,
growth in the developing countries of the Western Hemisphere,
which was estimated at 5.7 and 4.6 per cent in 2007
and 2008, is expected to fall to a positive 1.1 per
cent in 2009. That is, the continent seems to have escaped
the kind of contraction it was prone to in the past,
when the global economy faced crises of even lesser
intensities.
It was the poor performance of much of Africa and Latin
America since the 1970s that resulted in Asia emerging
as its showcase, with global capital talking up these
economies and attempting to garner the support of domestic
elites for more liberal policies. As success accompanied
each turn in policy, the shift to a regime that opened
these economies to trade, foreign direct investment
and purely financial flows intensified. Asia came to
symbolise the benefits to be derived from liberalisation
and global integration, and epitomise the view that
the world is flat with no walls to climb.
Over the last two decades and more this shift towards
more open strategies has indeed transformed Asia's relationship
with the rest of the world. While the region was earlier
home to a few mercantilist, export-oriented economies
like Japan, South Korea and Taiwan (Province of China),
in time every Asian economy, including the biggest,
was looking for a market abroad with some like China
proving extremely successful in manufacturing and others
like India in services. Moreover, while Asia could be
proud of a high degree of regional integration through
trade and investment flows, this integration reflected
not the decoupling of Asia from the rest of the world
but the creation of an export platform in which multi-country
production networks created products that were targeted
at world markets. Production processes were segmented,
and each segment located at appropriate sites that generated
intermediate products that were combined at the final
location ( such as China) to be shipped abroad. The
other impact of the process of liberalisation and integration
was a sharp increase in foreign investment flows to
the region, including large inflows of portfolio capital.
A concomitant of this inflow was the liberalisation
of rules regarding the presence and operation of foreign
firms, including financial firms like banks, merchant
banks, insurance companies, hedge funds and private
equity firms. Capital inflows in many countries in the
region were far in excess of that needed to finance
their current account deficits. In fact, some countries
with current account surpluses were also recipients
of large capital inflows.
Given such integration, it is not surprising that an
Asia that was experiencing robust growth till recently
has been affected quite adversely by the global financial
and economic crisis. As the financial crisis unfolded,
foreign financial investors in need of capital to cover
losses and meet margin calls at home unwound their positions
in Asia resulting in a collapse in stock markets in
many Asian economies. Countries like China, India and
Vietnam which had seen their stock markets outperforming
their global ''competitors'' were also the ones that recorded
the steepest falls. The outflow of capital put pressure
on many currencies, forcing central banks to unwind
a part of their reserves. A liquidity and credit contraction
ensued. Foreign financial institutions that were located
in these countries and were facing difficulties in global
markets had to downsize or close, leading to ripple
effects in domestic economies. Domestic financial institutions
exposed to sub-prime mortgage related assets recorded
large losses. Finally, the global economic recession
slowed export growth in these increasingly export-driven
economies. All this generated an Asian version of the
global financial and economic crisis, which is what
the collapse in aggregate growth figures reflects.
|
| |
|
Print
this Page |
|
|
|
|