|
Recorded history bear ample evidence of the extent to
which human beings are obsessed by sport. The need to
play is of course a deep urge common to all animals,
but perhaps the constant need to create ever more
elaborate forms of play is the most developed in
humans. So our current societies' preoccupation with
sport in various forms is not new.
Nor is the rise of spectatorhood -the move away from
mostly playing sports to mostly watching them - such a
new shift. People have always loved to watch
excellence in games performed by others, and that has
been used to advantage by rulers as well. Even the
ancient Roman emperors knew the value of circuses when
bread was in short supply.
Nevertheless, there are features in the current
situation that are quite new: the tremendous expansion
of the sports business, and the globalisation of it in
a quite novel way. All this has been much discussed,
and certainly we in India no longer need any reminding
of how closely certain sports in particular are linked
with business.
The business activities – and the profits to be made –
do not come only from the organisation of the game
itself, but also (and usually even more so) from
advertising and related promotion of all sorts of
other goods, as well as from more shady activities
like gambling and bookkeeping. There has been much
talk of how such sponsorship and other activities
threaten the "purity" of a game, and of what they do
to players' aspirations. But still, it is likely that
many of us do not really know the full extent to which
all of us – and even the players themselves – are
being manipulated in the new global organisation of
sports.
That is why a new book brought out (in Bengali) by a
team from the Ganashakti newspaper, "Globalisation
covers the sports field" (Maath dhekeche bishwayane,
Ganashakti Kolkata 2003) is so fascinating. This small
book manages to capture the essence of some of the
major changes in the way that sports are organised and
presented, the particular forms that the globalisation
of sport has taken and the implications for both
players and audiences.
One of the aspects that the book brings out most
clearly, is how the extensive commercialisation of
games has actually led to the growing unfreedom of
players. In a perceptive article on the Brazilian
football star Ronaldo, Debashish Chakravarty traces
the evolution of the boy from the slums of Bento
Roseiro, who has emerged as the game's latest and most
spectacular "phenomenon". Chakravarty suggests that
Ronaldo's early and harsh lessons in the role of money
– such as his inability to raise the fare to travel to
be auditioned to join the famous Brazilian club
"Flamingo" when he was a teenager – made him
understand the importance of sponsorship. This made
him actively seek out and respond to agents and
sponsors subsequently.
But of course such sponsorship carries its own
hazards. Several articles in the book reveal Ronaldo,
the illustrious and magical sportsman, to be
effectively the prisoner of the sports and footwear
multinational company Nike. Shantanu Dey describes
how, in the infamous World Cup final of 1998, when
Brazil met France, Ronaldo had convulsions the night
before the match, and was declared unfit. When the
Brazilian team arrived at the stadium without him,
there was panic among the sponsors, and especially
Nike.
Apparently at Nike's insistence (the company also
sponsors the Brazilian team as a whole and had paid
large amounts of money to them that year) the decision
to play without Ronaldo was reversed. The suffering
sportsman finally had to be injected with painkillers
and somehow brought to the playing field, where he
delivered one of his poorest ever performances. The
player had become a commodity more valuable than his
own health or abilities.
After all, the match was not simply a context between
Brazil and France, but also between Nike, personified
by Ronaldo, and Adidas, promoted by the
French-Algerian star Zinedine Zidane. In this
continuing tussle, the winning side keeps varying –
that year Adidas won, but of course in 2002 Nike
emerged the victor with a triumphant Ronaldo.
Football is (and has been for some time) the most
globalised and commercialised of all sports. Pritam
Sinha shows that the major European football clubs are
hugely profitable business enterprises, which are
usually part of much larger privately owned commercial
empires spanning other media and entertainment
activities as well.
These clubs draw into their ranks players from all
over the world, and increasingly from developing
countries. Indeed, for most footballers in the
developing world, the dream is to be accepted into
(and eventually purchased) by these clubs. Vast sums
are exchanged for the "purchase" of players, who are
allowed to keep some proportion of this money for
themselves. In addition, of course, there is the cash
to be had from advertising and promotions, as long as
the player is marketable.
Of the 23 main players in the team from Senegal that
won so many hearts at the 2002 World Cup, as many as
21 play in the French league. The real Senegalese
football, it has been pointed out, is not played
within Senegal, but in the clubs of Europe. And the
local football association within the country has been
reduced to little more than a talent-spotting
enterprise to allow local boys to enter that hallowed
world of demanding but rewarding European soccer.
Even in India, whose national team has never even
qualified for the Football World Cup, this process has
not just started but is getting entrenched. Shubhro
Mukhopadhyay describes how Indian football teams like
Mohun Bagan have become private limited companies in
their own right, and try to mimic their more
successful counterparts abroad by buying the lower
rung international players, and so on.
Of course, the current fever is all about cricket, and
Panu Bhattacharya provides a useful backdrop to the
huge media hype and attention that is being lavished
on the Indian cricket team. It is extraordinary the
extent to which, for months in advance of the World
Cup, the expectations of the masses in the country
have been built up by a wide-ranging series of
advertisements and obsessive descriptions in the media
of the wonderful qualities of this team.
The media hype was maintained and even pushed further,
despite poor performances abroad by what is after all
a fairly ordinary team by international standards,
simply to keep public attention – and consumer
interest - focussed on the World Cup and to ensure
adequate rewards for advertisers and other promoters
in the process. So overarching was this concern, that
even when the team played very badly in the first two
matches, this too became the focus of media attention,
overshadowing all other news.
On
the weekend in which history was being made on streets
across the world, as around 10 million people marched
peacefully in more than 600 cities to protest the Bush
administration's war against Iraq, most of our own
print and television media did not have the time or
space to describe this unprecedented set of events
which may mark a historical turning point. Instead,
they were all obsessed with the poor performance of
the Indian cricket team in the match against
Australia.
And our own cricket fans in turn, who had been led by
the same media to fantasise about winning the Cricket
World Cup, expressed their disappointment and anger
not only through acts of aggression on the streets,
but in what is now the most effective form of protest
in this business. Thousands of erstwhile fans declared
that they would no longer buy goods endorsed by our
cricketers, thereby threatening the entire material
edifice on which all the hype had been built. This
move sent such shivers down the spines of sponsors
that some of them were reduced to taking out large
advertisements in newspapers, pleading for people to
be more understanding of the cricketers!
It is not surprising that sponsors, advertisers and
those involved in the business are able to generate
such a frenzy of excitement among ordinary people. Of
course cricket and other games provide a welcome
distraction from the more depressing trends in current
affairs, and allow us to forget the irritations and
insecurities that increasingly plague daily existence.
But that is not the only reason.
Perhaps the more significant – even if subliminal –
reason has to do with the vicarious satisfaction that
is provided by the evidence of how individual
achievement, in some sports at least, can become the
means for social and economic advancement. This is all
the more satisfying when other instances of such
mobility have become less apparent.
In fact, sport – like other forms of entertainment –
is one of the few remaining means of individual social
mobility in a world in which economic stratification
is increasingly defined by access to quality
education, and where actual mobility has become more
restricted. The rags-to-riches stories of Ronaldo and
others, or the success of the possible boys-next-door
like Virender Sehwag, create a sense of fulfilment in
all of us, even more so because there a few such
stories in other fields.
This may be why all of us consent to become prisoners
of this new and ever more ambitious industry, as
players or as spectators, and why we allow the actual
game to be only the smallest part of the much more
important and profitable game that is being played out
by the corporate world.
|