| |
|
 |
|
|
The
Continuing
Paradox
of World
Manufacturing
Employment
|
|
|
Apr 30th 2002, Jayati Ghosh
&
C.P.
Chandrasekhar
|
|
IThe issue of the international relocation
of manufacturing production is one which has received and continues to
attract a great deal of attention from not just economists but policy
makers, trade unions and other analysts across the world. There is a
general sense that the past decade in particular has seen a significant
shift in the structure of international manufacturing production, which
is captured in the fact that developing countries now account for nearly
a quarter of world manufacturing goods exports, up from just over
one-tenth two decades ago.
Such relocation, which in turn is generally supposed
to imply a net loss of manufacturing jobs in the North and a net
expansion of such jobs in the South, has been seen as being driven by
both by the movement of capital, as multinational companies in
particular move to areas characterised by cheaper labour, and by trade
liberalisation which has allowed manufactured goods produced in Southern
locations to penetrate Northern markets. It is recognised that both of
these processes have been greatly facilitated by technological change
which has allowed for the locational breakup of the productive process
and the separation of various elements of it with differing types of
skill requirement. This has enabled as "the
vertical disintegration of production", with
the associated geographical separation of different parts of the
production process and increase in intra-industry trade.
It is sometimes argued that this has been accompanied by a process in
which manufacturing itself has become less important, both in world
production and world trade, as various services activities play more
significant roles. However, as Chart 1 shows, during the 1990s,
manufacturing exports grew at reasonable rates throughout the 1990s for
most important categories of goods, and for some, such as office and
telecom equipment, export growth was very rapid indeed.
Chart 1 >>
Of course, within this, the shift in location of manufacturing
production from developed to developing countries can be exaggerated. As
Chart 2b indicates, even in 2000, certain developed countries dominated
world trade in manufactured goods. Indeed, the United States, the
European Union and Japan together still accounted for more than 60 per
cent of manufactured exports in 2000. But what is evident is that the
share of the major developed country exporters had come down even over
the decade of the 1990s, continuing a process that had begun earlier and
was clearly evident in the 1980s.
Thus, as is clear from a comparison of Charts 2a and 2b, the share of
Germany in world manufacturing exports fell quite sharply from 16 per
cent to 10 per cent over the decade, and most other major developed
country exporters experienced declines in their shares of at least one
percentage point or more. Only the United States increased its share,
from 12 to 14 per cent, contrary to the widely held perception that it
dominated world manufactured goods trade only by virtue of its huge
capacity for manufactured imports. In contrast to this, countries like
the Peop0le's Republic of China and Mexico managed to nearly triple
their shares (albeit from relatively low bases) over this period.
Chart 2a
>>
Chart 2b >>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|